Faculty of Law

Permanent URI for this community

https://ir.oauife.edu.ng/handle/123456789/776

Browse

Browsing Faculty of Law by Author "Fabunmi, J. O."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    COMMERCIAL LAW IN THE CONTEXT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: THE NIGERIAN EXPERIENCE
    (OAU PRESS, 1987-05-12) Fabunmi, J. O.
    Commercial activities persist endlessly in time of peace and war. Government may be overthrown in coups, wars may break out, national disasters may occur but somehow commercial activities continue on a regular basis. 1 Merchants have always found a way of continuing business relationships in any given situation. Their ingenuity in formulating new techniques to meet the challenges of changing economic climates is unparalleled. One significant example of this ingenuity is the fashioning of a distinct body of rules derived from customs and usages to govern the transactions of merchants
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Duties of Directors and Controlling Shareholders in Relation to Share-Trading.
    (Obafemi Awolowo University, 1985) Barnes, Kiser Dave; Fabunmi, J. O.
    For nearly a score years the threatened or actual creation, allotment, and issue of company shares by its board of directors have provided the factual background for the leading cases on directors’ fiduciary duty to exercise management powers over shares for a proper corporate purpose. Akin to this matter are legal problems related to the exercise of share voting power by controlling shareholders ratifying directors’ improper issues of shares; and the use of those powers to alter the company’s articles of association in reference to shareholdings. Often in such matters, controlling shareholders breach their duty owed to the company to exercise their share-voting power bona fide in the interests of the company. Whether controlling shareholders act independently or collude with directors in these matters, the capacity of minority shareholders to enforce the duties owed by both organs is diminished by questionable standards of judicial review concerning the nature of the duties involved, and the scope of the division of powers between the board of directors and shareholders in general meeting.